Fine-tune the use casePick the one closest to you
A finance program forteams facing
Is every forecast review a round of corrections because teams build their numbers on different assumptions?
Usually yes. Every team forecasts from the facts it prefers, and the review spends its hour reconciling spreadsheets instead of deciding anything. This program aligns what your department heads know, believe and do when they forecast, in four one-hour team sessions.
Make it for your team
Execution readinessExample scores for a team like yours. Add your website to estimate your own. Measured once your team plays. Ready at 80.
Where it usually breaks40Today92/ 100After the 4 team sessions
Ready to executeShared knowledgeHigh riskFive different assumptions behind the same line
Shared convictionMedium riskTeams see the forecast as a number to defend, not a view to share
Shared practiceHigh riskThe same facts produce five different forecasts
4 sessions~50 min each8–12 people per teamNo facilitatorThe gap
What you'd typically hear if five of your budget owners answered alone.
SESSION 1 · FILL THE GAPSAnswered alone
Finish the sentence: when my forecast depends on a number nobody has agreed yet, I…MMira…use the agreed company assumption, and flag where I disagree.
JJonas…use my own best guess. I know my area.
AAylin…use last year, to be safe.
TTomas…leave it out and explain in the review.
RRosa…honestly, I'm not sure where the agreed assumptions are.
What it costs you if nobody notices
Shared knowledgeFive assumptions, one lineWhen each team uses its own growth rate and price, the consolidated forecast is a sum of opinions, and nobody can say what it assumes.
Shared convictionThe number is defended, not sharedA team that sees its forecast as a target to defend builds in a cushion, and the company plans on a number nobody believes.
Shared practiceThe review corrects instead of decidesWhen the same facts produce five forecasts, the review spends its hour on the differences and never reaches the decision.
The program that closes the gap
Four one-hour sessions. Every one of your department heads, the same assumptions, a review that decides.
Session
Shared knowledgeShared convictionShared practice
S1Know the assumptionsAgrees the company assumptions, where they live, and what a team may change.
Shared knowledge1Agree the company's forecast assumptions2Fill in the gaps together to agree one shared way of…Shared conviction3Decide as the CFO, then meet the real reasons behind the…Shared practice4Agree how a team should respond to each type of forecast…5Rehearse how you would handle an unagreed forecast assumption
DemoS2Share the numberShows you whether teams believe the forecast is a shared view, and why they pad it.
Shared knowledge1Quiz each other on what "the agreed forecast number"…Shared conviction2Surface whether your team's forecast number is truly believed3Decide as the CFO whether to approve or push back a padded forecastShared practice4Sort real forecasting situations into the response your…5Rehearse the moment you must flag an unagreed forecast…
DemoS3Build from the same factsDecides the same forecast questions alone from the same facts, compares and aligns on one set.
Shared knowledge1Answer the same forecast questions alone from the same factsShared conviction2Make the same forecast call the CFO wouldShared practice3Match each forecast situation to the right move4Rank the priorities for handling a forecast number nobody…
DemoS4Run the reviewPractises the review: the difference, the correction and the decision it should reach.
Shared knowledge1Run a practice forecast reviewShared conviction2Decide as the CFO, then meet the real reasons behind how…Shared practice3Practice the forecast review as a sequence4Rehearse the forecast review moment to align on the difference
DemoPlay it yourself · a short demo · one exercise from session 3 · Make the Call
Alone first. Then the team agrees on one answer.
This is a taste, not the whole session. “Build from the same facts” runs 4 exercises with your own team, on a call or in a room. Here is one of them, on the real screens, played with four AI teammates, so you can feel how a session works.
Build from the same facts · Make the Call00:00MJLSYouMake the same forecast call the CFO would, on a real pricing conflictOn screen: Rewrite each forecasting situation as the decision you would actually make alone
You are playing with 4 AI teammates. Every screen opens on its briefing: read it, then tap I’m ready.
Readiness intelligence · what you'll see as teams play
Know which of your department heads would build the forecast the same way, and where you should step in, before the next review becomes a round of corrections.
Your company › Readiness intelligence › One set of assumptionsEvery one of your department heads builds the forecast on the same assumptions, so the review is about the business, not the numbers
Readiness index92%Ready+52 pts25% participation + 25% progress + 50% alignment · Ready at 80
Shared knowledge48 → 88Shared conviction37 → 71Shared practice44 → 80
Participation94%9 of 10 people played at least once
Progress75%3 of 4 planned sessions completed
Alignment41% →78%31 of 40 points aligned
Failed alignment pointsWhere you should step in
The customer who will not pay 5%Not aligned in 15 of 40 playsShared knowledgeYour sales forecasters · 6 people
Is my forecast a view to share, or a number to defend?"Not yet, we still have concerns" in 2 playsShared convictionYour business unit leaders · 8 people
Your department heads could play this next week. Add your website to make it yours.
- 01 · 5 minConfirm the assumptionsCheck what we inferred about you and edit any text in place. Your edits are locked.
- 02 · 1 link per teamInvite your teamAny browser, any device. No account, nothing to install.
- 03 · after each playWatch readiness fill inYou see who played, what they agreed, and where to follow up.
Used by teams at
Free until you play live · ISO 27001 · EU data
Free until you play live · ISO 27001 · EU data