ExecuteOS
Fine-tune the use casePick the one closest to you
A finance program forteams facing
Example for 25 managers · 4 one-hour sessions

Do your managers keep asking Finance to approve decisions they should know how to make?

Usually yes. The rules say what a manager can approve, and every manager asks anyway, because asking is safer than being wrong. This program aligns what your managers know, believe and do with the routine decisions, in four one-hour team sessions.

Make it for your team
https://
Or see the sample program ↓
Execution readiness
27Today82/ 100After the 4 team sessions
Ready to execute
Example scores for a team like yours. Add your website to estimate your own. Measured once your team plays. Ready at 80.
Where it usually breaks
Shared knowledgeHigh riskManagers do not know what they are allowed to approve
Shared convictionHigh riskThey believe asking Finance is safer than deciding
Shared practiceMedium riskThe same case is approved by one manager and escalated by another
4 sessions~50 min each8–12 people per teamNo facilitator
The gap

What you'd typically hear if five of your budget owners answered alone.

SESSION 1 · FILL THE GAPSAnswered alone
Finish the sentence: when my team needs a purchase that is inside my limit but not in the plan, I…
MMira…approve it. That is what the limit is for.
JJonas…check it against the plan and the rules, then approve it myself.
AAylin…ask Finance, to be safe.
TTomas…ask my own manager first.
RRosa…honestly, I'm not sure what my limit is.
What it costs you if nobody notices
Shared knowledgeThe rules are known to Finance onlyWhen managers do not know what they may approve, every decision is a question, and Finance answers the same one fifty times.
Shared convictionAsking is the safe choiceA manager who believes a wrong call ends their career asks for everything, and the team waits two weeks for a laptop.
Shared practiceTwo managers, two answersWhen the same case is approved in one team and escalated in another, the team that waited learns to go round the rule.
The program that closes the gap

Four one-hour sessions. Every one of your managers, the same rules, decided without asking.

Session
Shared knowledgeShared convictionShared practice
S1Know your limitsAgrees what a manager may approve, what goes to Finance and what is never approved.
Shared knowledge1Agree what a manager can approve alone2Agree the exact words for who approves spendShared conviction3Vote as a team on whether you now back the CFO's approval…Shared practice4Sort real spending situations into approve5Rehearse the exact moment a purchase falls inside your…
Demo
S2Trust the ruleShows you whether managers believe deciding is safer than asking, and what a wrong call really costs.
Shared knowledge1Quiz each other on whether deciding or asking Finance is…Shared conviction2Face what a wrong or delayed approval call really costs…3Decide a real spending call as the CFO wouldShared practice4Sort real Acme spending situations into approve5Decide together whether to trust your approval limit or…
Demo
S3Decide the same casesSorts the same spending cases alone into approve, ask Finance and decline, then aligns.
Shared knowledge1Quiz yourselves and agree the right call on four spending…Shared conviction2Decide whether the CFO's call on the subscription request…Shared practice3Sort four spending requests into approve4Decide the urgent subscription request together
Demo
S4Decide under pressurePractises the urgent request, the one just over the limit and the one that should be declined.
Shared knowledge1Answer the same four approval-limit questions aloneShared conviction2Rewrite three risky spending moments the way the CFO would…Shared practice3Sort urgent, over-limit and declinable purchase requests…4Practise the CFO's sequence for an over the limit request and align on
Demo
Play it yourself · a short demo · one exercise from session 3 · Sort the Situations

Alone first. Then the team agrees on one answer.

This is a taste, not the whole session. “Decide the same cases” runs 4 exercises with your own team, on a call or in a room. Here is one of them, on the real screens, played with four AI teammates, so you can feel how a session works.

Decide the same cases · Sort the Situations00:00MJLSYou
Sort four spending requests into approve, ask Finance or decline, then align as a teamOn screen: Sort each of the 6 spending requests into its correct response alone
On your ownWork on your own. Your answer stays private until everyone is done.
03:00
YStay muted
Sort each of the 6 spending requests into its correct response alone
labels
Ask Finance
Decline
Approve
tasks · any order
01A replacement laptop for a team member, inside your approval limit and already in the plan
drag or tap a label
02A conference trip for three people, just over your approval limit
drag or tap a label
03A software subscription a vendor says expires tomorrow unless you pay now
drag or tap a label
04A supplier asking to be paid before the contract is signed
drag or tap a label
05A small office supplies order, inside your limit but not listed in this quarter's plan
drag or tap a label
06A new vendor contract at double your approval limit with no urgency attached
drag or tap a label
Drag a label or tap one, then tap an item to place it
0/6 placed
You are playing with 4 AI teammates. Every screen opens on its briefing: read it, then tap I’m ready.
Readiness intelligence · what you'll see as teams play

Know which of your managers would decide the routine cases themselves, and where you should step in, before Finance spends another week answering the same question.

Your company › Readiness intelligence › Routine finance decisionsEvery one of your managers makes the routine finance decisions they are allowed to, without asking25 managers enrolled · 3 of 4 sessions played · 7 plays · owner: you
Readiness index82%Ready+55 pts25% participation + 25% progress + 50% alignment · Ready at 80
Shared knowledge48 → 88Shared conviction37 → 71Shared practice44 → 80
Participation94%24 of 25 people played at least once
Progress75%3 of 4 planned sessions completed
Alignment41% →78%78 of 100 points aligned
Failed alignment pointsWhere you should step in
The urgent subscriptionNot aligned in 15 of 42 playsShared knowledgeYour newest managers · 18 people
Is deciding myself really safer than asking?"Not yet, we still have concerns" in 2 playsShared convictionYour engineering managers · 12 people
Sample data. Before anyone plays, readiness is estimated from your material. Real numbers come only from live plays with your team.
You are looking at a sample

See how ready your team really is.

Add your website and, optionally, what's changing. We estimate your team's readiness and build the four sessions that close the gaps, for your plan, rules and departments.

About 10 minutes · nothing is sent to your team

Your managers could play this next week. Add your website to make it yours.

  1. 01 · 5 minConfirm the assumptionsCheck what we inferred about you and edit any text in place. Your edits are locked.
  2. 02 · 1 link per teamInvite your teamAny browser, any device. No account, nothing to install.
  3. 03 · after each playWatch readiness fill inYou see who played, what they agreed, and where to follow up.
Used by teams atCommerzbankIBMPaysafeEndavaLucidLinkFree until you play live · ISO 27001 · EU data